Ostrum
  • News & Chronicles
  • France
  • Euro Area
  • United States
  • International
  • Politics & Society
  • Monetary Policy
  • Media
  • Decoding
  • About Philippe Waechter
Philippe Waechter's blog
  • Insights
  • About us
  • Expertise
  • Our people
  • Media

Philippe Waechter's blog
My french blog
  • News & Chronicles
  • France
  • Euro Area
  • United States
  • International
  • Politics & Society
  • Monetary Policy
  • Media
  • Decoding
  • About Philippe Waechter
  • News & Chronicles
  • Climate
  • France
  • Euro Area
  • United States
  • International
  • Politics & Society
  • Monetary Policy
  • Media
  • Decoding
Philippe Waechter's blog
Prévôté
Previous Next
  • 3 min

Coming this week (Jan 20-26) – What to keep in mind from last week ?

  • 20 January 2020
  • Philippe Waechter
  • BoJ
  • ECB
  • INSEE Climat des Affaires
  • Markit
  • MMonetary Policy
  • UK Labor Market
  • ZEW
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

ECB meeting, BoJ meeting, ZEW survey, Climat des Affaires in France, Markit surveys, UK labor market, ECB survey on banks’ lending

Highlights

—ECB meeting on monetary policy (Jan.23) BoJ meeting on monetary policy (Jan.21)
The relative stabilization in the economic activity will not create incentives for the ECB to adopt a more accommodative monetary policy. The strategic review that was announced by Christine Lagarde in December will be discussed as will be the negative impact of the negative rates on consumers’ behavior.
Nothing expected in Tokyo for the BoJ meeting.

The Markit survey for January in the Euro Area, Japan, UK and the US (Jan.24)
The flash estimate for January will probably continue to show the manufacturing recession in most countries. In the US there is a strong divergence between the Markit index and the ISM. The last one shows a deep recession in the manufacturing sector.
The main support for the economic activity is the services sector. —

ZEW survey for January (Jan.21)
The ZEW index, measured as the average of the current situation and of the expectations indices, recovered strongly but remains in the negative territory at the end of 2019. Its level is still too low to be consistent with a reversal in the economic activity. —

French Climat des Affaires for January (jan.22)
The French business cycle index is robust. The impact of the strike mainly on transportation will be limited and transitory. —

ECB Bank survey for the first quarter of 2020 (jan.21)
The survey will be interesting on companies’ side. We will be focused on their demand for credit and the reasons mentioned for it. At the end of 2019, the main reasons were fixed investment and mergers. At the same time, the demand to expand the current business cycle was weak —

Employment in the UK (Jan.21)
The lower momentum in the UK economy will conclude, sometime in the future, by a lower dynamics on the labor markets. —

Other statistics: The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) for December (Jan.22), the trade balance in Japan( 23), the EA consumer confidence index (23), the CPI in Japan (24) and the CBI survey on the business cycle in the UK (22)

What to keep in mind from last week ?

—Industrial Production in the US
The index was down in December (-0.3%) while the manufacturing index was up by 0.16%. On a YoY comparison the industrial production is 0.9% lower than a year ago and the manufacturing sector was down by -1.2%.
The interesting point on the US economy is the strong divergence between the excess capacity index and the unemployment rate. Since 2015, there is a divergence between the two. Before, they each represented the US business cycle with a reversal of the cycle that was first seen in the excess capacity. Now a change in the excess capacity is no longer linked with a change in the unemployment rate. The question may be on the importance of the manufacturing sector in the US business cycle or may be on the change on the US labor market that makes it less sensitive to the business cycle ? —

The US – China trade agreement
The US trade policy has had an important impact on the Chinese exports’ profile as it is shown on the graph. The Chinese exports to the US are almost at their lowest level.
The trade agreement is mainly based on the 200 bnUSD that China will purchase to the US during 2020 and 2021 (the reference to measure these 200 bn is 2017). It will be mainly agriculture products, commodities (oil) and industrial products. Three remarks
1 – As it is a bilateral framework, the Chinese purchases will be done at the expense of other countries (Brazil on soybean). It reflects the US idea that a multilateral world is costly for the US. This is not necessarily WTO compatible.
2 – The impulse effect on the world economy will be close to 0. It will lower uncertainty and this may be a boost for growth.
2 – There are no prices associated with these purchases. How things will work ?
3 – It’s an incentive for China to develop its business outside the US
4 – This doesn’t end the trade conflict between the two countries. The technological leadership which is the heart of the trade dispute was not directly discussed. —

The Chinese growth was at 6.1% in 2019 after 6.7% in 2018.
The Chinese growth will continue to slow in coming years as the services sector is more and more important providing less and less productivity gains.

The detailed version of this post can be downloaded

NextWeek-January-20 – January-26- 2020Download
Related Topics
  • BoJ
  • ECB
  • INSEE Climat des Affaires
  • Markit
  • MMonetary Policy
  • UK Labor Market
  • ZEW
Subscribe to the newsletter

All the news from Philippe Waechter’s blog in your mailbox


Loading

Le magazine d’experts d’Ostrum

ABOUT OSTRUM AM
  • About us
  • Media room
  • Our publications
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
FOLLOW ME ON
EXTERNAL LINKS
  • Economists
  • Think tank
  • Central banks
  • Blog roll
©Ostrum AM 2025
An affiliate of : Plan de travail 2

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}