Ostrum
  • News & Chronicles
  • France
  • Euro Area
  • United States
  • International
  • Politics & Society
  • Monetary Policy
  • Media
  • Decoding
  • About Philippe Waechter
Philippe Waechter's blog
  • Insights
  • About us
  • Expertise
  • Our people
  • Media

Philippe Waechter's blog
My french blog
  • News & Chronicles
  • France
  • Euro Area
  • United States
  • International
  • Politics & Society
  • Monetary Policy
  • Media
  • Decoding
  • About Philippe Waechter
  • News & Chronicles
  • Climate
  • France
  • Euro Area
  • United States
  • International
  • Politics & Society
  • Monetary Policy
  • Media
  • Decoding
Philippe Waechter's blog
Prévôté
Previous Next
  • 2 min

The Emergence of DeepSeek: Thoughts on the Future of the Technology Industry

  • 29 January 2025
  • Philippe Waechter
  • AI
  • China
  • DeepSeek
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

The advent of DeepSeek is an event of considerable magnitude.
Not simply because the Chinese firm has made a simpler, cheaper but equally effective product than its American competitors. This above all reflects the questioning of the American industrial strategy of isolating China.

Tech companies in the United States have been favored by investors for many months. They have been innovative, thus giving themselves the opportunity to collectively accumulate an income. The translation of this advantage is their explosive valuation. The world of tomorrow being anticipated to depend even more than today on technology, investors want to take advantage of it with portfolios built around this field.

This valuation has been accentuated by the US government’s push to ease restrictions on technology transfers in China. In the past, the Middle Kingdom has benefited from these transfers but has also invested massively in research and education in order to be competitive.
With DeepSeek, we see that the strategy led by Washington is not sufficient to maintain the American lead, and perhaps it is not the right maneuver to keep China in second division. The drop in valuations reflects this.

The combination of tech giants and Washington’s aggressive strategy has failed to keep China at bay.
If the DeepSeek model is less sophisticated in its construction, without an Nvidia chip, cheaper than ChatGPT but just as efficient, we will see a battle to exclude the newcomer from the very profitable AI game. This is a legitimate strategy when a competitor enters the arena with more attractive features. The consumer will benefit with lower prices.
Unless the US government takes safeguard measures to defend Silicon Valley Tech.

On an international scale, the important thing is to know who will define the standard technology, the one that will be used without thinking about it. The Americans have benefited from this advantage for decades, thus creating considerable revenue streams for the American economy. If with a technology made with 3 pieces of string the Chinese are able to do as well and cheaper, they have a spectacular comparative advantage and considerable room for maneuver to be able to define this famous technological standard.

This battle over the standard has caused tensions over the Pacific for several years. The cards are now being reshuffled because the hierarchy for the next 10 years is becoming more blurred. Companies will show ingenuity with sometimes surprising alliances. On the government side, anything goes.
AI is a tool of domination and therefore woe to the vanquished.

Related Topics
  • AI
  • China
  • DeepSeek
Subscribe to the newsletter

All the news from Philippe Waechter’s blog in your mailbox


Loading

Le magazine d’experts d’Ostrum

ABOUT OSTRUM AM
  • About us
  • Media room
  • Our publications
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
FOLLOW ME ON
EXTERNAL LINKS
  • Economists
  • Think tank
  • Central banks
  • Blog roll
©Ostrum AM 2025
An affiliate of : Plan de travail 2

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}